Economic Development Corp. of Dade County v. Turner

485 So. 2d 494, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 726, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7028
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1986·No. No. 86-420·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat petitioner’s request for writ of prohibition as a petition for writ of certiora-ri, Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c), grant certiorari, and quash the “Order Granting [Metropolitan Dade County’s] Motion to Intervene” on a finding that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing Metropolitan Dade County to intervene after the entry of final judgment. See Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So.2d 435 (Fla.1969); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hanson Dredging, Inc., 393 So.2d 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Wong v. Von Wersebe, 365 So.2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Economic Development Corp. of Dade County v. Turner, 485 So. 2d 494, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 726, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

485 So. 2d 494 (Economic Development Corp. of Dade County v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PS Capital, LLC v. Palm Springs Town Homes, LLC
9 So. 3d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Rodriguez v. FERNWOODS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N.
957 So. 2d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)