Ecological Rights Foundation v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company

District Court, S.D. California·Decided September 13, 2024·No. 3:24-cv-01614·Unknown

Opinion

ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, Case No.: 24-cv-1614-RSH-MMP et al., ORDER DIRECTING ADDITIONAL Plaintiffs, v. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant. Before the Court is a joint motion to enter consent decree [ECF No. 3] filed by Plaintiffs Ecological Rights Foundation and San Diego Coastkeeper and Defendant San Diego Gas & Electric Company. The Court DIRECTS the Parties to file a joint supplemental brief addressing how the proposed consent decree is procedurally and substantively “fair, adequate and reasonable” and “conform[s] to applicable laws.” United States v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 580 (9th Cir. 1990). The Parties should also address how the proposed decree furthers the objectives of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. See Local No. 93, Int’l Asso. of Firefighters, etc. v. Cleveland, 478 U.S. 501, 525 (1986). The joint brief should be no more than ten pages in length and be filed on or before September 27, 2023. Dated: September 13, 2024 febut C □□ onae

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ecological Rights Foundation v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company, (S.D. Cal. 2024).

Ecological Rights Foundation v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company (Ecological Rights Foundation v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Oregon
913 F.2d 576 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)