E.C.M.C. Corp. v. Mora
586 So. 2d 1083, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1991 WL 128308
Opinion
We reverse the order denying E.C.M.C. costs. See Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1990); Kanaar v. Goodwin, 567 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). We affirm the order denying E.C.M.C. attorney’s fees. See Mujica v. Turner, 582 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Reversed in part; affirmed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
E.C.M.C. Corp. v. Mora, 586 So. 2d 1083, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1991 WL 128308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
586 So. 2d 1083 (E.C.M.C. Corp. v. Mora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aspen v. Bayless
564 So. 2d 1081 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Mujica v. Turner
582 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Kanaar v. Goodwin
567 So. 2d 1006 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)