E.C.M.C. Corp. v. Mora
586 So. 2d 1083, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1991 WL 128308
This text of 586 So. 2d 1083 (E.C.M.C. Corp. v. Mora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
E.C.M.C. Corp. v. Mora, 586 So. 2d 1083, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1991 WL 128308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
We reverse the order denying E.C.M.C. costs. See Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1990); Kanaar v. Goodwin, 567 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). We affirm the order denying E.C.M.C. attorney’s fees. See Mujica v. Turner, 582 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Reversed in part; affirmed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aspen v. Bayless
564 So. 2d 1081 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Mujica v. Turner
582 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Kanaar v. Goodwin
567 So. 2d 1006 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
586 So. 2d 1083, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1991 WL 128308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ecmc-corp-v-mora-fladistctapp-1991.