Eckstrom v. Yellow Taxicab Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eckstrom v. Yellow Taxicab Co.

175 A.D. 882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 882 (Eckstrom v. Yellow Taxicab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eckstrom v. Yellow Taxicab Co., 175 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that the testimony of the plaintiff herself shows that she was chargeable with contributory negligence as matter of law. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. [883]*883Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Page, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that the testimony of the plaintiff herself shows that she was chargeable with contributory negligence as matter of law. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. [883]*883Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Page, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckstrom-v-yellow-taxicab-co-nyappdiv-1916.