Eckols & Abercrombie v. Reeves

61 Ga. 214
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was a bill filed by complainants against the defendants with a prayer for an injunction upon the allegations contained therein, which was granted by the chancellor on the hearing therefor: whereupon the defendants excepted. In Dickson vs. Haralson, decided during the present term, we held that a homestead exemption of personalty might be [215]*215supplemented with, a homestead of realty under the constitution of 1868. There was no abuse of discretion in granting the injunction prayed for in this case.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eckols & Abercrombie v. Reeves, 61 Ga. 214 (Ga. 1878).

61 Ga. 214 (Eckols & Abercrombie v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.
31 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 177 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1933)
Gober v. Richards
128 S.E. 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)