Ecknozzio Okeith Fontenot v. State
This text of Ecknozzio Okeith Fontenot v. State (Ecknozzio Okeith Fontenot v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Ecknozzio Okeith Fontenot v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-18-00077-CR
Trial court case number: 1540146
Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County
Without an agreed punishment recommendation, appellant, Ecknozzio Okeith Fontenot, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at confinement for eight years. Appellant timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. On May 31, 2018, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to clarify appellant’s right of appeal1 and, if necessary, appoint counsel to represent appellant on appeal. On August 20, 2018, the trial court held a hearing at which appellant appeared by videoconference. At that hearing, appellant stated that he intended to go forward with the appeal and “plan[ed] on hiring a lawyer” within “the next couple of months.” However, no attorney has appeared in this Court on appellant’s behalf and he has now filed a request for court-appointed counsel. The clerk’s record filed in this appeal shows that the trial court found that appellant was indigent, and appointed counsel represented appellant in the trial court. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to appoint counsel, at no expense to appellant, to represent him on appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (c), (d)(1), 26.04 (b)(1), (c), (p). The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order appointing appellate counsel within 30 days of the date of this order.
1 The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record that includes a certification of appellant’s right of appeal stating that the case “is not a plea-bargain case, and [appellant] has the right of appeal.” The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: September 11, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ecknozzio Okeith Fontenot v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ecknozzio-okeith-fontenot-v-state-texapp-2018.