Ecklund v. Nevada Wholesale Lumber Co.
This text of 596 P.2d 218 (Ecklund v. Nevada Wholesale Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Ecklund v. Nevada Wholesale Lumber Co., 93 Nev. 196, 562 P.2d 479 (1977), reversed a judgment of the district court holding Ecklund personally liable for a debt in the amount of $9,633.63 admittedly owed by Ecklund Insulation Inc. to Nevada Wholesale Lumber Co. We there noted that although Ecklund influenced and governed Ecklund Insulation Inc., the evidence otherwise was insufficient to permit utilization of the alter ego doctrine.
[431]*431Following that decision Ecklund filed a motion in the district court for an award of attorney’s fees. His motion was denied and this appeal followed. We affirm.
The district court has the discretionary authority to allow attorney’s fees to a defendant as prevailing party when the plaintiff has not sought recovery in excess of $10,000. NRS 18.010(2)(c); Casey v. Williams, 87 Nev. 137, 482 P.2d 824 (1971). The court is not required to do so. Here, the court evidently considered all the circumstances existing between the parties including the unsatisfied judgment against Ecklund Insulation, and concluded that it would be inequitable to further penalize Nevada Wholesale Lumber. This determination was well within the bounds of judicial discretion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
596 P.2d 218, 95 Nev. 430, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ecklund-v-nevada-wholesale-lumber-co-nev-1979.