Eckles v. State

639 So. 2d 523, 1993 WL 333596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eckles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 904
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 3, 1993·No. CR-92-916·Published

Opinion

[524]*524 ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Donnie Lee Eekles, appealed the summary denial of his post-conviction petition filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. We remanded this cause so that the trial court could clarify its order denying the petition. Eckles v. State, 639 So.2d 523 (Ala.Cr.App.1993).

The trial court has complied with our directions and has stated the reasons for denying the petition, which raised the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court correctly states that this issue was addressed by this court on direct appeal, in an unpublished memorandum, and is therefore procedurally barred in this collateral proceeding. Rule 32.2(a)(4), A.R.Crim.P.

This judgment in this cause is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eckles v. State, 639 So. 2d 523, 1993 WL 333596 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

639 So. 2d 523 (Eckles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eckles v. State
639 So. 2d 523 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)