Eckl v. State

841 S.W.2d 617, 311 Ark. 79, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 690
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Eckl v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 312 Ark. 544
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 9, 1992·No. CR 92-1188·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard G. Eckl, by his attorney, Michael Knollmeyer has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 965; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eckl v. State, 841 S.W.2d 617, 311 Ark. 79, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 690 (Ark. 1992).

841 S.W.2d 617 (Eckl v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)