Eckl v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Eckl v. State

841 S.W.2d 617, 311 Ark. 79, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 690

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 9, 1992

DocketCR 92-1188

StatusPublished

This text of 841 S.W.2d 617 (Eckl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eckl v. State, 841 S.W.2d 617, 311 Ark. 79, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 690 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard G. Eckl, by his attorney, Michael Knollmeyer has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 965; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard G. Eckl, by his attorney, Michael Knollmeyer has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 965; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 S.W.2d 617, 311 Ark. 79, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckl-v-state-ark-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack