Eckhart v. Zion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eckhart v. Zion

6 A.D.2d 885, 177 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 A.D.2d 885 (Eckhart v. Zion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eckhart v. Zion, 6 A.D.2d 885, 177 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and subdivision 2 of section 280 of the Village Law to review an assessment for local improvements. The benefit assessment district consists of two development tracts of unequal area. Each tract was assessed in an equal amount, upon considerations deemed to be equitable. The village trustees appeal from an order which annulled the assessment and remitted the matter to them “for a new determination in accordance with law”. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The record establishes that appellants did not apportion and assess the part of the expense to be raised by local assessment upon the lands in the assessment district according to frontage, area or assessed value, or according to any other method determined during the proceedings to be just and equitable, as provided in section 280 of the Village Law. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and subdivision 2 of section 280 of the Village Law to review an assessment for local improvements. The benefit assessment district consists of two development tracts of unequal area. Each tract was assessed in an equal amount, upon considerations deemed to be equitable. The village trustees appeal from an order which annulled the assessment and remitted the matter to them “for a new determination in accordance with law”. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The record establishes that appellants did not apportion and assess the part of the expense to be raised by local assessment upon the lands in the assessment district according to frontage, area or assessed value, or according to any other method determined during the proceedings to be just and equitable, as provided in section 280 of the Village Law. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 885, 177 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckhart-v-zion-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack