Eckhart v. Irons

18 Ill. App. 173, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 129
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 6, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Ill. App. 173 (Eckhart v. Irons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eckhart v. Irons, 18 Ill. App. 173, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 129 (Ill. Ct. App. 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that, upon the undisputed facts, the alleged right of complainants, as appurtenant to their respective lots, to have the building line in question observed by every other lot owner, is too doubtful to justify a court of equity in awarding a permanent injunction against defendants ; and that this doubt arises from the peculiar clause contained in the deeds from Laflin, through wdiich and whom, each party to the suit derives title. We have, therefore, substantially upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth and given in the opinion of the chancellor decided to affirm his decree dismissing the bill for want of equity.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Kimball
289 N.W. 213 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ill. App. 173, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckhart-v-irons-illappct-1886.