Eckhart v. Irons

Illinois Supreme Court

Eckhart v. Irons

6 N.E. 15, 114 Ill. 469

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 N.E. 15 (Eckhart v. Irons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eckhart v. Irons, 6 N.E. 15, 114 Ill. 469 (Ill. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This appeal must he dismissed. It comes directly from the circuit court of Goolc county to this court, upon the hypothesis, we presume, that it involves a freehold. This is a misapprehension. Conceding all that appellants claim in respect to the strip of land in question, it amounts to an easement, only, and we have repeatedly held this does not constitute a freehold.

The appeal will he dismissed, with leave to appellants to withdraw the record, abstracts and briefs, if they shall desire to do so.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

This appeal must he dismissed. It comes directly from the circuit court of Goolc county to this court, upon the hypothesis, we presume, that it involves a freehold. This is a misapprehension. Conceding all that appellants claim in respect to the strip of land in question, it amounts to an easement, only, and we have repeatedly held this does not constitute a freehold.

The appeal will he dismissed, with leave to appellants to withdraw the record, abstracts and briefs, if they shall desire to do so.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.E. 15, 114 Ill. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckhart-v-irons-ill-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack