Eckhart v. Irons
6 N.E. 15, 114 Ill. 469
Opinion
This appeal must he dismissed. It comes directly from the circuit court of Goolc county to this court, upon the hypothesis, we presume, that it involves a freehold. This is a misapprehension. Conceding all that appellants claim in respect to the strip of land in question, it amounts to an easement, only, and we have repeatedly held this does not constitute a freehold.
The appeal will he dismissed, with leave to appellants to withdraw the record, abstracts and briefs, if they shall desire to do so.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eckhart v. Irons, 6 N.E. 15, 114 Ill. 469 (Ill. 1885).
6 N.E. 15 (Eckhart v. Irons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. West Chicago St. R. R.
105 Ill. App. 439 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Commissioners of Highways v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
34 Ill. App. 32 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)