Eckhart v. Depart. of Children & Families
This text of Eckhart v. Depart. of Children & Families (Eckhart v. Depart. of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
DANIEL G. ECKHART, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2346 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES and CORRECT CARE ) RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ) ) Appellees. ) )
Opinion filed June 9, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Desoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge.
Daniel G. Eckhart, pro se.
Rebecca Kapusta, General Counsel, and Paul Sexton, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.
Gregory A. Kummerlen of Wiederhold, Moses, Kummerlen & Waronicki, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellee Correct Care Recovery Solutions.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of Daniel Eckhart's petition for writ of
habeas corpus. This disposition is without prejudice to Mr. Eckhart's right to resubmit
the petition with a proper oath in the trial court.
WALLACE, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eckhart v. Depart. of Children & Families, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckhart-v-depart-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2017.