Eckert v. Wolf
This text of 9 Ky. Op. 309 (Eckert v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It is not the duty of the court in instructing a jury in a civil cause to give all the law applicable to the case, unless proper instructions are presented by the parties or their counsel. That rule applied to criminal cases only.
The instruction given by the court seems to us to be correct as far as it goes, and if counsel desired to have other propositions given to the jury for their guidance, they should have proposed and presented to the court the instructions they wished given, and not having- done so the only question this court can consider is whether the instruction as given was correct as far as it went.
The evidence before the jury was conflicting, and we cannot say that the finding was palpably wrong. The order traversing the allegations made by the appellant applied to the answer as amended.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ky. Op. 309, 1877 Ky. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckert-v-wolf-kyctapp-1877.