Eckert v. Truman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eckert v. Truman

158 A.D. 939, 143 N.Y.S. 1115

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

After entry of judgment the judgment debtor may appeal by another attorney without any substitution. (Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656; Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N. Y. Supp. 757; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695.) Mr. White’s authority to represent Mrs. Truman in these proceedings had since the judgment, stands undisputed by Mr. Davenport, the former attorney of record. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and to set aside the other proceedings taken in behalf of the appellant is denied, but without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After entry of judgment the judgment debtor may appeal by another attorney without any substitution. (Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656; Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N. Y. Supp. 757; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695.) Mr. White’s authority to represent Mrs. Truman in these proceedings had since the judgment, stands undisputed by Mr. Davenport, the former attorney of record. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and to set aside the other proceedings taken in behalf of the appellant is denied, but without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ .

Eckert v. Truman, 158 A.D. 939, 143 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

158 A.D. 939 (Eckert v. Truman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related