Eckart v. Hulse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eckart v. Hulse

54 A.D.2d 744, 387 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14386

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 744 (Eckart v. Hulse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eckart v. Hulse, 54 A.D.2d 744, 387 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the appellants to place a certain proposition on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 2, 1976, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 7, 1976, which, inter alia, directed the town board to call a special election on November 2, 1976 for the purpose of voting on the proposition. Judgment affirmed, without costs [745]*745or disbursements. Special Term properly determined that the proposition should be submitted to the electorate on November 2, 1976. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the appellants to place a certain proposition on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 2, 1976, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 7, 1976, which, inter alia, directed the town board to call a special election on November 2, 1976 for the purpose of voting on the proposition. Judgment affirmed, without costs [745]*745or disbursements. Special Term properly determined that the proposition should be submitted to the electorate on November 2, 1976. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 744, 387 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eckart-v-hulse-nyappdiv-1976.