Eckart v. Hulse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eckart v. Hulse

54 A.D.2d 744, 387 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14386

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 1976·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the appellants to place a certain proposition on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 2, 1976, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 7, 1976, which, inter alia, directed the town board to call a special election on November 2, 1976 for the purpose of voting on the proposition. Judgment affirmed, without costs [745] or disbursements. Special Term properly determined that the proposition should be submitted to the electorate on November 2, 1976. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the appellants to place a certain proposition on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 2, 1976, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 7, 1976, which, inter alia, directed the town board to call a special election on November 2, 1976 for the purpose of voting on the proposition. Judgment affirmed, without costs [745] or disbursements. Special Term properly determined that the proposition should be submitted to the electorate on November 2, 1976. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Eckart v. Hulse, 54 A.D.2d 744, 387 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 744 (Eckart v. Hulse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.