Eck v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Eck v. State

617 So. 2d 470, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 1993 WL 142724

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1993

DocketNo. 91-2769

StatusPublished

This text of 617 So. 2d 470 (Eck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eck v. State, 617 So. 2d 470, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 1993 WL 142724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction under section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1989), and the sentence imposed following conviction; however, we reverse appellant’s conviction for direct criminal contempt because the evidence is insufficient to sustain that conviction. We further note that the judgment of conviction for direct contempt fails to recite the underlying facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. See Gidden v. State, 613 So.2d 457 (Fla.1993); Webb v. State, 561 So.2d 1367 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Wells v. State, 487 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismissed, 491 So.2d 281 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

We affirm appellant’s conviction under section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1989), and the sentence imposed following conviction; however, we reverse appellant’s conviction for direct criminal contempt because the evidence is insufficient to sustain that conviction. We further note that the judgment of conviction for direct contempt fails to recite the underlying facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. See Gidden v. State, 613 So.2d 457 (Fla.1993); Webb v. State, 561 So.2d 1367 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Wells v. State, 487 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismissed, 491 So.2d 281 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 So. 2d 470, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5421, 1993 WL 142724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eck-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack