Echols v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Echols v. State

361 S.W.3d 476, 2012 WL 828022, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 322

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2012

DocketED 96579

StatusPublished

This text of 361 S.W.3d 476 (Echols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Echols v. State, 361 S.W.3d 476, 2012 WL 828022, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 322 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Echols (Echols) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, the Honorable Nancy L. Schneider presiding. Echols pled guilty to one count of trafficking in the first degree, three counts of sale of a controlled substance, and one count of receiving stolen property. The court sentenced Echols as a prior and persistent offender to twenty (20) years on each of the trafficking and sale charges, and ten (10) years on the receiving stolen property charge. All sentences were to be served concurrently for a total of twenty (20) years in prison.

On appeal, Echols argued that the circuit court erred in the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Echols (Echols) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, the Honorable Nancy L. Schneider presiding. Echols pled guilty to one count of trafficking in the first degree, three counts of sale of a controlled substance, and one count of receiving stolen property. The court sentenced Echols as a prior and persistent offender to twenty (20) years on each of the trafficking and sale charges, and ten (10) years on the receiving stolen property charge. All sentences were to be served concurrently for a total of twenty (20) years in prison.

On appeal, Echols argued that the circuit court erred in the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

361 S.W.3d 476, 2012 WL 828022, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echols-v-state-moctapp-2012.