Echols v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Echols v. State

202 S.W.3d 722, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2006 WL 2806699

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 3, 2006

DocketED 87677

StatusPublished

This text of 202 S.W.3d 722 (Echols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Echols v. State, 202 S.W.3d 722, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2006 WL 2806699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Echols appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Echols appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 S.W.3d 722, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2006 WL 2806699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echols-v-state-moctapp-2006.