Echols v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Echols v. State

202 S.W.3d 722, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2006 WL 2806699

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Echols v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 298 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 2006·No. ED 87677·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Echols appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Echols appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Echols v. State, 202 S.W.3d 722, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1485, 2006 WL 2806699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

202 S.W.3d 722 (Echols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.