Echols v. Southern Mining & Engineering Co.

200 Ga. 608
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 3, 1946
DocketNo. 15423
StatusPublished

This text of 200 Ga. 608 (Echols v. Southern Mining & Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echols v. Southern Mining & Engineering Co., 200 Ga. 608 (Ga. 1946).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Justice.

A motion was made to dismiss the writ of error in this case on the ground, among others, that “nowhere in said bill of exceptions is any person or persons named as defendant in error or defendants in error by designation or by the alleged statement of the facts in said bill of exceptions.” Held, it appearing from the bill of exceptions that this statement is true, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. Panter, 178 Ga. 258 (173 S. E. 131); Hancock v. Lizella Fruit Farm, 184 Ga. 73 (190 S. E. 362); Gehr v. Atlanta, 189 Ga. 701 (7 S. E. 2d, 264), and citations.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Linton 8. James and Joe Hill Smith, for plaintiff. D. F. Black, H. G. Vandiviere, John 8. Wood, Howell Brooke, J. L. Davis, Fred D. Neel, William A. Ingram, and 8am Manley III, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gehr v. City of Atlanta
7 S.E.2d 264 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. Panter
173 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Hancock v. Lizella Fruit Farm
190 S.E. 362 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 Ga. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echols-v-southern-mining-engineering-co-ga-1946.