Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie County

638 F. App'x 242
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2016·No. No. 15-2324·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Echols appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie Cnty., No. 2:14-ev-00033-FL, 2015 WL 5725513 (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 30, 2015; entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie County, 638 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2016).

638 F. App'x 242 (Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ALLEN v. ELWELL
M.D. North Carolina, 2022