Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie County

638 F. App'x 242
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2324
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 638 F. App'x 242 (Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie County, 638 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Echols appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie Cnty., No. 2:14-ev-00033-FL, 2015 WL 5725513 (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 30, 2015; entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ALLEN v. ELWELL
M.D. North Carolina, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 F. App'x 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echols-v-sheriff-of-bertie-county-ca4-2016.