Echols v. Crawford

43 S.E. 59, 116 Ga. 771, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 253
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

The petition which was brought to the county court set out no cause of action against the defendant, and contained no allegations which would authorize a recovery against him. It was, therefore, properly dismissed on demurrer, and the judge of the superior court committed no error .in refusing to grant the writ of certiorari to review said ruling.

Judgment affirmed.'

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Echols v. Crawford, 43 S.E. 59, 116 Ga. 771, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 1902).

43 S.E. 59 (Echols v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armour Car Lines v. Summerour
63 S.E. 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)