Echols v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Echols v. Crawford

43 S.E. 59, 116 Ga. 771, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 253

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 S.E. 59 (Echols v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Echols v. Crawford, 43 S.E. 59, 116 Ga. 771, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

The petition which was brought to the county court set out no cause of action against the defendant, and contained no allegations which would authorize a recovery against him. It was, therefore, properly dismissed on demurrer, and the judge of the superior court committed no error .in refusing to grant the writ of certiorari to review said ruling.

Judgment affirmed.'

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little, J.

The petition which was brought to the county court set out no cause of action against the defendant, and contained no allegations which would authorize a recovery against him. It was, therefore, properly dismissed on demurrer, and the judge of the superior court committed no error .in refusing to grant the writ of certiorari to review said ruling.

Judgment affirmed.'

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.E. 59, 116 Ga. 771, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echols-v-crawford-ga-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack