Echols v. Canon U.S.A. Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 16, 2011
• Docket: 10-1822
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1822

PAULETTE ECHOLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CANON U.S.A., INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01151-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 16, 2011

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paulette Echols, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia E. Robinson, John Francis Scalia, Matthew Harrold Sorensen, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paulette Echols appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on her claims

of racial and age discrimination and retaliation. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED