Echols v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Echols v. Angelone

161 F. App'x 250

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 30, 2005

DocketNo. 05-7118

StatusPublished

This text of 161 F. App'x 250 (Echols v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Echols v. Angelone, 161 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to refund the appellate filing fee paid in a prior appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Angelone, No. CA-01-155-3-REP (E.D. Va. June 30, 2005). We grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to refund the appellate filing fee paid in a prior appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Angelone, No. CA-01-155-3-REP (E.D. Va. June 30, 2005). We grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 F. App'x 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echols-v-angelone-ca4-2005.