Echols v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Echols v. Angelone

161 F. App'x 250

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 05-7118·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to refund the appellate filing fee paid in a prior appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Angelone, No. CA-01-155-3-REP (E.D. Va. June 30, 2005). We grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to refund the appellate filing fee paid in a prior appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Angelone, No. CA-01-155-3-REP (E.D. Va. June 30, 2005). We grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Echols v. Angelone, 161 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 250 (Echols v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.