ECHOLES v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

ECHOLES v. State

348 S.W.3d 119, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1202, 2011 WL 4036515

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 2011

DocketED 95690

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 119 (ECHOLES v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ECHOLES v. State, 348 S.W.3d 119, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1202, 2011 WL 4036515 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Echóles appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Echóles appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 S.W.3d 119, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1202, 2011 WL 4036515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echoles-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack