ECHOLES v. State

348 S.W.3d 119, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1202, 2011 WL 4036515
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2011·No. ED 95690·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Echóles appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ECHOLES v. State, 348 S.W.3d 119, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1202, 2011 WL 4036515 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 119 (ECHOLES v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Favaloro v. LAMBOLEY
348 S.W.3d 119 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)