Echineque v. State
This text of Echineque v. State (Echineque v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-10-0000201 20-DEC-2010 08:12 AM
NO. SCOT-10-0000201
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
ARWIN R. ECHINEQUE, Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.
and Circuit Judge Pollack, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon review of the petition for HRPP Rule 40 post-
conviction relief filed in the supreme court by petitioner
Arwin R. Echineque, it appears that we lack jurisdiction to
consider the petition. See HRS § 602-5 (Supp. 2009); HRPP Rule
40(b). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 20, 2010.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Echineque v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echineque-v-state-haw-2010.