Echeverry v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Echeverry v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

230 So. 3d 40

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 2017

DocketNo. 4D16-3611

StatusPublished

This text of 230 So. 3d 40 (Echeverry v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Echeverry v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 230 So. 3d 40 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

We affirm the order directing the clerk to issue the certificate of title to appellee at the end of 'this mortgage foreclosure proceeding. Appellant’s claim that the order was .void as a result of the automatic stay of bankruptcy, after the filing of her seventh petition for bankruptcy, is without merit. Because she did not file her bankruptcy petition until after issuance of the certificate of sale of the property, her right of redemption had terminated and her interest in the property was already extinguished. See § 45.0316, Fla. Stat. (2014); Household Fin. & Mortg. Co. v. Osta, 862 So.2d 885, 886 (Fla. 6th DCA 2003).

Affirmed.

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.'

We affirm the order directing the clerk to issue the certificate of title to appellee at the end of 'this mortgage foreclosure proceeding. Appellant’s claim that the order was .void as a result of the automatic stay of bankruptcy, after the filing of her seventh petition for bankruptcy, is without merit. Because she did not file her bankruptcy petition until after issuance of the certificate of sale of the property, her right of redemption had terminated and her interest in the property was already extinguished. See § 45.0316, Fla. Stat. (2014); Household Fin. & Mortg. Co. v. Osta, 862 So.2d 885, 886 (Fla. 6th DCA 2003).

Affirmed.

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 So. 3d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echeverry-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-co-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack