Echeverri v. Saga Bay Co.

624 So. 2d 416, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9982, 1993 WL 390372
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 1993
DocketNos. 92-2611, 92-2588
StatusPublished

This text of 624 So. 2d 416 (Echeverri v. Saga Bay Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echeverri v. Saga Bay Co., 624 So. 2d 416, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9982, 1993 WL 390372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders dismissing the action against James Burgin. The complaint fails to state a cause of action against Burgin, individually, for violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1989). See [417]*417Ellis v. N.G.N. of Tampa, Inc., 586 So.2d 1042 (Fla.1991); McDaniel v. Sheffield, 431 So.2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 440 So.2d 352 (Fla.1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDaniel v. Sheffield
431 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Ellis v. NGN of Tampa, Inc.
586 So. 2d 1042 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 416, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9982, 1993 WL 390372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echeverri-v-saga-bay-co-fladistctapp-1993.