Echevarria v. State
This text of 454 So. 2d 680 (Echevarria v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having carefully considered the record in this consolidated criminal appeal, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel, we conclude that the errors raised as issues on appeal are either harmless errors, United States v. Hastings, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); Drake v. State, 441 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1983); Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981), or were not preserved for appellate review by contemporaneous objection below. Sims v. State, 444 So.2d 922 (Fla.1983); Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908 (Fla.1983); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 So. 2d 680, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echevarria-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.