Echevarria v. State
Opinion
Having carefully considered the record in this consolidated criminal appeal, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel, we conclude that the errors raised as issues on appeal are either harmless errors, United States v. Hastings, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); Drake v. State, 441 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1983); Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981), or were not preserved for appellate review by contemporaneous objection below. Sims v. State, 444 So.2d 922 (Fla.1983); Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908 (Fla.1983); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
454 So. 2d 680 (Echevarria v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.