Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole

Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole

896 So. 2d 778, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20186, 2004 WL 3015191
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-1686
StatusPublished

This text of 896 So. 2d 778 (Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 896 So. 2d 778, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20186, 2004 WL 3015191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ware v. E. Louis Fields, PA, 477 So.2d 667 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The fee awards that are the subject of this appeal are not to be duplicated in the future in this class action, should the class members prevail, even if it is perceived that the work done for these fees ultimate[779]*779ly benefitted the entire class, not just the original plaintiffs.

BENTON, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ware v. E. Louis Fields, P.A.
477 So. 2d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 So. 2d 778, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20186, 2004 WL 3015191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echevarria-mccalla-raymer-barrett-frappier-v-cole-fladistctapp-2004.