Echavarria-Chapa v. INS

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Echavarria-Chapa v. INS. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 F.3d 1143
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 15, 1996·No. 95-60330·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60330

Summary Calendar

JORGE LUIS ECHAVARRIA-CHAPA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A38 103 392

- - - - - - - - - -

February 6, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jorge Luis Echavarria-Chapa asserts that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) abused its discretion in denying his application for waiver of deportability; 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). Echavarria contends that the BIA erred in deferential review to the Immigration Judge's credibility determination, the BIA's determination that he was not eligible for a waiver of deportation was not supported by substantial evidence, the BIA failed to balance the equities adequately, and the case should be

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 95-60330

-2-

remanded for reconsideration in light of two cases subsequently decided. We have reviewed the record and the BIA's order and perceive no reversible error.

The petition for review is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Echavarria-Chapa v. INS, (5th Cir. 1996).

Echavarria-Chapa v. INS (Echavarria-Chapa v. INS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182(c)