Eccleston v. State
92 So. 3d 289, 2012 WL 2864390, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 13, 2012
DocketNos. 5D11-3445, 5D11-3555, 5D11-3745, 5D11-3746, 5D11-3747, 5D11-3827, 5D11-3848, 5D11-3850, 5D11-3851, 5D11-3879, 5D11-3880
StatusPublished
This text of 92 So. 3d 289 (Eccleston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eccleston v. State, 92 So. 3d 289, 2012 WL 2864390, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 So. 3d 289, 2012 WL 2864390, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eccleston-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.