Eby v. Concord Heights Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Eby v. Concord Heights Co.

90 A. 40, 27 Del. 481, 4 Boyce 481, 1914 Del. LEXIS 57

DecidedMarch 5, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A. 40 (Eby v. Concord Heights Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eby v. Concord Heights Co., 90 A. 40, 27 Del. 481, 4 Boyce 481, 1914 Del. LEXIS 57 (Del. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion is granted. Ennis v. Ennis, 5 Harr. 390; Smith v. Commercial Fire Ins. Co., No. 86, May Term, New Castle County, 1899 (unreported) in which the action was changed from “covenant” to “case”. Revised Code, c. 112, § 15..

The court made the following order:

“And now, to wit, this fifth day of March, A. D. 1914, the above motion having been considered by the court, the same is allowed, and the form of the above action is changed from an action of case to an action of covenant.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion is granted. Ennis v. Ennis, 5 Harr. 390; Smith v. Commercial Fire Ins. Co., No. 86, May Term, New Castle County, 1899 (unreported) in which the action was changed from “covenant” to “case”. Revised Code, c. 112, § 15..

The court made the following order:

“And now, to wit, this fifth day of March, A. D. 1914, the above motion having been considered by the court, the same is allowed, and the form of the above action is changed from an action of case to an action of covenant.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A. 40, 27 Del. 481, 4 Boyce 481, 1914 Del. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eby-v-concord-heights-co-delsuperct-1914.