Ebuzoeme v. Holder

352 F. App'x 773
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2009·No. No. 09-1105·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oyoyo Adanna Ebuzoeme, a native and citizen of the United Kingdom, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for re[774]*774view for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ebuzoeme (B.I.A. Dec. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ebuzoeme v. Holder, 352 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2009).

352 F. App'x 773 (Ebuzoeme v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related