Ebron v. New York City Police New York City Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ebron v. New York City Police New York City Police Department

280 A.D.2d 404, 720 N.Y.S.2d 790, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 280 A.D.2d 404 (Ebron v. New York City Police New York City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ebron v. New York City Police New York City Police Department, 280 A.D.2d 404, 720 N.Y.S.2d 790, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered October 21, 1999, which denied plaintiffs application to compel defendant to return money that the police allegedly took from him upon his arrest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Property Clerk’s voucher on which plaintiff relied in support of the application does not list any money as having been taken from plaintiff upon his arrest in December 1994, and the record is otherwise devoid of evidence of any such taking. Accordingly, plaintiff fails to establish entitlement to return of any money (Administrative Code of City of NY § 14-140 [f]). In any event, assuming the existence of such money, the instant application, made in September 1999, almost five years after plaintiffs arrest and more than two years after his release from prison, is time-barred (General Municipal Law § 50-i). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered October 21, 1999, which denied plaintiffs application to compel defendant to return money that the police allegedly took from him upon his arrest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Property Clerk’s voucher on which plaintiff relied in support of the application does not list any money as having been taken from plaintiff upon his arrest in December 1994, and the record is otherwise devoid of evidence of any such taking. Accordingly, plaintiff fails to establish entitlement to return of any money (Administrative Code of City of NY § 14-140 [f]). In any event, assuming the existence of such money, the instant application, made in September 1999, almost five years after plaintiffs arrest and more than two years after his release from prison, is time-barred (General Municipal Law § 50-i). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 404, 720 N.Y.S.2d 790, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebron-v-new-york-city-police-new-york-city-police-department-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack