Ebrahimi v. CCW Lantana, LLC
Opinion
1 2 3 6 7 JAMES EBRAHIMI, Case No.: 2:19-cv-00325-JCM-NJK Plaintiff(s), 8 ORDER 9 [Docket No. 48] 10 CCW LANTANA, LLC, et al., Defendant(s). 11 12 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to stay discovery. Docket No. 48. The parties 13] request a stay of all discovery deadlines pending the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ motion to 14! compel Plaintiff to undergo a mental competency examination. See id. at 1. 15 The Court has broad discretionary power to control discovery. See, e.g., Little v. City of 16] Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988). Additionally, the Court must construe, administer, and 17] employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive 18} determination of every action and proceeding.” 19 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation to stay all discovery deadlines 20] pending the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff to undergo a mental 21} competency examination. Docket No. 48. 23 Dated: October 29, 2020 24 7 _. — Nancy, J. Koppe □ 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26
27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ebrahimi v. CCW Lantana, LLC (Ebrahimi v. CCW Lantana, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.