Ebitz v. Smith
This text of 525 A.2d 219 (Ebitz v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[220]*220MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
In this attorney fee arbitration case, Julia Smith appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Penobscot County, confirming an award of a fee arbitration panel of the Board of Overseers, of the Bar and entering judgment for the attorney, Elizabeth Kelly Ebitz. The Uniform Arbitration Act requires that a court “shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are argued for vacating or modifying or correcting the award....” 14 M.R.S.A. § 5937 (1980). Smith did not raise or generate any grounds for “vacating or modifying or correcting the award.” The Superior Court, therefore, correctly confirmed the award and correctly entered judgment for Ebitz.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 A.2d 219, 1987 Me. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebitz-v-smith-me-1987.