Ebert v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

Court of International Trade

Ebert v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 375, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1320

United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 2006·No. Court No. 05-00297·Published

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

POGUE, Judge:

On January 17, 2006, this court issued an Order to Show Cause why the captioned case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The court established February 10, 2006 as the deadline for Plaintiff to establish such good cause for why this action should not be dismissed. Having received no showing of good cause by the Plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

POGUE, Judge:

On January 17, 2006, this court issued an Order to Show Cause why the captioned case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The court established February 10, 2006 as the deadline for Plaintiff to establish such good cause for why this action should not be dismissed. Having received no showing of good cause by the Plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.

Ebert v. United States Secretary of Agriculture, 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 375, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (cit 2006).

Pincite

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 375 (Ebert v. United States Secretary of Agriculture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.