Ebert v. Spangler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ebert v. Spangler

3 Pen. & W. 389

DecidedMay 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pen. & W. 389 (Ebert v. Spangler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ebert v. Spangler, 3 Pen. & W. 389 (Pa. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The foreign attachments having been quashed can affect the question no more than if they never had existed. The case, then, simply presents the claim of trustees in a domestic attachment, to the residue of money in the sheriff’s hands, after satisfaction of an execution, on which the absconding debtor’s property was sold; and is it possible to doubt of its solidity? The trustees stand in the plea of the debtor, are invested with all his, rights, and are clearly entitled to recover.

Judgment of the court below reversed, and judgment rendered here for the plaintiff,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The foreign attachments having been quashed can affect the question no more than if they never had existed. The case, then, simply presents the claim of trustees in a domestic attachment, to the residue of money in the sheriff’s hands, after satisfaction of an execution, on which the absconding debtor’s property was sold; and is it possible to doubt of its solidity? The trustees stand in the plea of the debtor, are invested with all his, rights, and are clearly entitled to recover.

Judgment of the court below reversed, and judgment rendered here for the plaintiff,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Pen. & W. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebert-v-spangler-pa-1832.