Ebert v. Coyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ebert v. Coyne

255 A.D. 810, 7 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 810 (Ebert v. Coyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ebert v. Coyne, 255 A.D. 810, 7 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

— Plaintiffs in one of three actions appeal from the order of Special Term, Nassau county, removing the several actions to the Supreme Court and consolidating them with the action pending in the Supreme Court. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We cannot say from the record that the order appealed from passed beyond the limit of a sound judicial discretion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Plaintiffs in one of three actions appeal from the order of Special Term, Nassau county, removing the several actions to the Supreme Court and consolidating them with the action pending in the Supreme Court. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We cannot say from the record that the order appealed from passed beyond the limit of a sound judicial discretion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 810, 7 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebert-v-coyne-nyappdiv-1938.