Ebert v. Bollman
106 A.D.2d 920, 483 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21851
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to execute medical authorizations granted (see Hostler v Tonawanda Super Duper, 104 AD2d 720). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Bayger, J. — preclusion order.) Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ebert v. Bollman, 106 A.D.2d 920, 483 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
106 A.D.2d 920 (Ebert v. Bollman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simon v. City of Syracuse Police Department
13 A.D.3d 1228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)