Ebert v. Bollman
106 A.D.2d 920, 483 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 106 A.D.2d 920 (Ebert v. Bollman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ebert v. Bollman, 106 A.D.2d 920, 483 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to execute medical authorizations granted (see Hostler v Tonawanda Super Duper, 104 AD2d 720). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Bayger, J. — preclusion order.) Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Simon v. City of Syracuse Police Department
13 A.D.3d 1228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.2d 920, 483 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebert-v-bollman-nyappdiv-1984.