Eberle v. Hunter

1916 OK 939, 160 P. 88, 61 Okla. 254, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 876
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 14, 1916
Docket8222
StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 939 (Eberle v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eberle v. Hunter, 1916 OK 939, 160 P. 88, 61 Okla. 254, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 876 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

EDWARDS, C.

This case was appealed to this court, and the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The ease now comes on on motion of the defendant in error for a judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond under the provisions of chapter 249, Session Laws of 1915. The motion is sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in favor of the defendant in error, John S. Hunter, and against Harry P. Hickey, surety on the super-sedeas bond of plaintiffs in error, in the sum of $966.28', with interest at 6 per cent, per annum from June 2, 1914, and all costs .in the lower court, together with the costs incurred in this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1916 OK 939, 160 P. 88, 61 Okla. 254, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eberle-v-hunter-okla-1916.