Eberhardt v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Eberhardt v. State

203 A.2d 267, 236 Md. 608, 1964 Md. LEXIS 920

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedSeptember 23, 1964

DocketNo. 428

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.2d 267 (Eberhardt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eberhardt v. State, 203 A.2d 267, 236 Md. 608, 1964 Md. LEXIS 920 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, convicted of receiving stolen goods, contends [609]*609on appeal that the evidence was insufficient and that a statement implicating himself was improperly obtained because of an alleged promise to release his girl friend. Without reviewing the evidence we think it is only necessary to state that we find it sufficient. The trial court was fully justified in believing the police officers who denied making any promises, particularly when the appellant himself admitted that there was no bargain made.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, convicted of receiving stolen goods, contends [609]*609on appeal that the evidence was insufficient and that a statement implicating himself was improperly obtained because of an alleged promise to release his girl friend. Without reviewing the evidence we think it is only necessary to state that we find it sufficient. The trial court was fully justified in believing the police officers who denied making any promises, particularly when the appellant himself admitted that there was no bargain made.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.2d 267, 236 Md. 608, 1964 Md. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eberhardt-v-state-md-1964.