Eberhardt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Eberhardt v. State

71 S.E. 948, 9 Ga. App. 589, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 246

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 4, 1911·No. 2996·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The evidence authorizes the verdict.

2. Requests for instructions to the jury are not a part of the record. Grounds of a motion for new trial, which except to the court’s action in refusing to give or in qualifying certain' requested instructions, are not sufficient, when the alleged requests are not set forth.

3. The assignments of error as to the charge of the court are not meritorious. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. The evidence authorizes the verdict.

2. Requests for instructions to the jury are not a part of the record. Grounds of a motion for new trial, which except to the court’s action in refusing to give or in qualifying certain' requested instructions, are not sufficient, when the alleged requests are not set forth.

3. The assignments of error as to the charge of the court are not meritorious. Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt v. State, 71 S.E. 948, 9 Ga. App. 589, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

71 S.E. 948 (Eberhardt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.