Ebarilli v. Shi Sen Li
89 A.D.3d 792, 932 N.Y.2d 377
Opinion
Inasmuch as the defendant City of New York failed to meet its prima facie burden, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it without considering the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ papers in opposition (see Morales v County of Suffolk, 82 AD3d 1184, 1185-1186 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ebarilli v. Shi Sen Li, 89 A.D.3d 792, 932 N.Y.2d 377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 792 (Ebarilli v. Shi Sen Li) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morales v. County of Suffolk
82 A.D.3d 1184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)