Ebarilli v. Shi Sen Li

89 A.D.3d 792, 932 N.Y.2d 377

This text of 89 A.D.3d 792 (Ebarilli v. Shi Sen Li) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ebarilli v. Shi Sen Li, 89 A.D.3d 792, 932 N.Y.2d 377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Inasmuch as the defendant City of New York failed to meet its prima facie burden, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it without considering the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ papers in opposition (see Morales v County of Suffolk, 82 AD3d 1184, 1185-1186 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morales v. County of Suffolk
82 A.D.3d 1184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 792, 932 N.Y.2d 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebarilli-v-shi-sen-li-nyappdiv-2011.