Ebarb v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Ebarb v. Cupp

468 P.2d 905, 2 Or. App. 365, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 651

DecidedMay 7, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 468 P.2d 905 (Ebarb v. Cupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ebarb v. Cupp, 468 P.2d 905, 2 Or. App. 365, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 651 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM

The petitioner was originally sentenced to a life sentence under one conviction, to run concurrently with a 20-year sentence imposed under another conviction. The life sentence was vacated in post-conviction proceedings and thereafter the petitioner was re-sentenced to a 15-year term under that conviction to run consecutively rather than concurrently with the 20-year sentence previously imposed under the other conviction.

The sole question presented on appeal is if an erroneous sentence imposed to run concurrent to another sentence is later vacated, may the sentence imposed to replace the vacated sentence be imposed to run consecutively?

As the petitioner concedes, this precise question has been answered in the affirmative. by the Oregon Supreme Court in Froembling v. Gladden, 244 Or 314, 417 P2d 1020 (1966).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI