Ebanks v. State

789 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786, 2001 WL 716887
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 27, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-3915
StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 463 (Ebanks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ebanks v. State, 789 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786, 2001 WL 716887 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance of the trial court’s order is without prejudice to appellant’s challenge to the voluntary and intelligent character of his plea by post-conviction proceedings. Jones v. State, 781 So.2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Mortimer v. State, 770 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

DELL, POLEN, and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
781 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Mortimer v. State
770 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786, 2001 WL 716887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebanks-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.