Ebanks v. State

789 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786, 2001 WL 716887
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 2001·No. No. 4D00-3915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance of the trial court’s order is without prejudice to appellant’s challenge to the voluntary and intelligent character of his plea by post-conviction proceedings. Jones v. State, 781 So.2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Mortimer v. State, 770 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

DELL, POLEN, and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ebanks v. State, 789 So. 2d 463, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8786, 2001 WL 716887 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 463 (Ebanks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
781 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Mortimer v. State
770 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)