Ebanks v. Reserve Marine Enterprises, Inc.

625 So. 2d 1050, 1993 La. LEXIS 2927, 1993 WL 413538
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 15, 1993
Docket93-C-1707
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 1050 (Ebanks v. Reserve Marine Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ebanks v. Reserve Marine Enterprises, Inc., 625 So. 2d 1050, 1993 La. LEXIS 2927, 1993 WL 413538 (La. 1993).

Opinion

625 So.2d 1050 (1993)

Davis EBANKS, Jr. and Lisa Ebanks
v.
RESERVE MARINE ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.

No. 93-C-1707.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 1993.
Rehearing Denied November 12, 1993.

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. The factual question of whether a floating structure is a vessel is to be decided by the trier of fact. Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Gizoni, 502 U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 486, 116 L.Ed.2d 405 (1991); Ducote v. V. Keeler & Co., Inc., 953 F.2d 1000 (5th Cir.1992); Orgeron v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 561 So.2d 38 (La.1990). Since "even marginal claims are properly left for jury determination" (Ducote, 953 F.2d at 1002), the trial court erred in holding that this crane barge was not a vessel as a matter of law. The summary judgment is reversed and the case remanded for trial on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LEMMON, J., would grant and docket the case.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Dunn
924 So. 2d 224 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
Howell v. American Cas. Co. of Reading
691 So. 2d 715 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 1050, 1993 La. LEXIS 2927, 1993 WL 413538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebanks-v-reserve-marine-enterprises-inc-la-1993.