E.B. v. Verniero

Third Circuit

E.B. v. Verniero

127 F.3d 298, 1997 WL 628063

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 1997

DocketNo. 96-5132

StatusPublished

This text of 127 F.3d 298 (E.B. v. Verniero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

E.B. v. Verniero, 127 F.3d 298, 1997 WL 628063 (3d Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regutar active service, and no judge who con-curved in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Judge Becker would have granted rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regutar active service, and no judge who con-curved in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Judge Becker would have granted rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 F.3d 298, 1997 WL 628063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eb-v-verniero-ca3-1997.