E.B. v. Verniero

Third Circuit

E.B. v. Verniero

127 F.3d 298, 1997 WL 628063

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 17, 1997·No. No. 96-5132·Published

Opinion

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regutar active service, and no judge who con-curved in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Judge Becker would have granted rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regutar active service, and no judge who con-curved in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Judge Becker would have granted rehearing.

E.B. v. Verniero, 127 F.3d 298, 1997 WL 628063 (3d Cir. 1997).

Pincite

127 F.3d 298 (E.B. v. Verniero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.