Eaton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Eaton v. State

1914 OK CR 160, 141 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 657, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 54

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 13, 1914

DocketNo. A-2075.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 160 (Eaton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eaton v. State, 1914 OK CR 160, 141 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 657, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 54 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Eaton, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of Pontotoc county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no prejudicial error. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Eaton, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of Pontotoc county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no prejudicial error. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 160, 141 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 657, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eaton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.